Why Plato Hated Democratic Elections

And how to break the endless cycle

Ancient Greek philosophers like Socrates and Plato held deep reservations about democracy. They saw it as inherently flawed and doomed to descend into tyranny. 

But a later thinker saw a way to avoid this inevitable cycle. The Greek historian Polybius, writing 200 years after Plato, proposed a new system of government. 2,000 years later, his ideas still shape the lives of people across the world — especially Americans.

Let’s explore why democracy is flawed, what Polybius proposed to break the cycle of tyranny, and how it directly shaped the U.S. Constitution…

---

Reminder: this is a teaser of our Saturday-morning deep-dives.

Upgrade to get the full articles every weekend — and help support our mission!

You’ll get weekly in-depth articles, members-only podcasts, and breakdowns of history’s greatest art. 👇

---

Socrates and the "Ship of State"

First, let’s address the concerns of Socrates and Plato. The former used a metaphor for democracy, likening the Athenian state to a ship:

Imagine a vessel whose crew is completely untrained in navigation. When asked to choose a captain, the crewmates are unable to determine who is actually qualified to lead — they don’t know the ins and outs of the trade. As such, they will likely select the person who is most persuasive in earning their vote, not the one with actual expertise in seafaring.

The Ship of Fools, Andrei Mironov (2012)

For Socrates, democracy suffered from the problem of allowing the uneducated masses to make critical decisions for the state. Instead of a qualified leader, the best rhetorician often won, appealing to emotions rather than reason. This, he argued, made democracy a system vulnerable to manipulation, wherein politicians win by stoking public passions instead of promoting rational governance.

In Socrates’ view, voting was a skill that must be learned and exercised responsibly. Without the knowledge required to make informed choices, citizens were unequipped to select competent leaders.

Plato on Democracy and Tyranny

Plato expanded on Socrates’ concerns. In The Republic, he outlined five forms of government in a hierarchy, with aristocracy (rule by the best) at the top and tyranny at the bottom. Democracy ranked only above tyranny, as Plato believed the former inevitably decayed into the latter. 

Plato argued that a democracy, by prioritizing freedom and equality, allowed citizens to pursue their individual desires unchecked. This indulgence of personal interests over the collective good creates an environment where self-centered behavior and short-term gains overshadow long-term stability.

It is out of these conditions that demagogues emerge, playing on the selfish interests of the vulnerable — and prioritizing their authority over societal well-being.

Pericles's Funeral Oration, Philipp Foltz (1852)

Plato’s solution? An aristocracy of philosopher-kings: rulers educated in the “good” and committed to governance through wisdom. Those in society with a profound knowledge of what is "good”, i.e., the philosophers, should be in charge.

But Plato acknowledged his system was also fragile, as even philosopher-kings would be corrupted by the desire for approval, which ultimately leads to decay.

Polybius’ Solution

200 years after Plato, the Greek historian Polybius offered a new approach to break the cycle of political degeneration. He observed that the three basic forms of government tend to decline in a repeating cycle that leads back to anarchy: monarchies become tyrannies, aristocracies become oligarchies, and democracies dissolve into mob rule. 

But unlike Socrates and Plato, Polybius saw a solution in the structure of the Roman Republic. He noted that it incorporated elements of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy, each balancing the others.

For example, Consuls functioned as executive leaders, representing monarchical power. The Senate, composed of Rome’s elite, acted as an aristocratic institution offering stability and oversight. Meanwhile, the Assemblies gave the public a democratic voice. 

Cicero Denounces Catiline, Cesare Maccari (1888)

This system of checks and balances, Polybius argued, prevented any single group from gaining unchecked power.

His idea of a resilient government founded on the separation of powers influenced later thinkers like the French political philosopher ​​Montesquieu, who developed his notion further. His political treatise The Spirit of Law was a major influence on the American Founding Fathers, who referenced it as they drafted the U.S. Constitution.

Today, you can see each of these forces (monarchy, aristocracy and democracy) at work in the American system…

The Key to a Lasting Democracy