Between the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 AD and the Renaissance nearly a thousand years later, there lies an interesting in-between period.
You might call it a “middle age” between the classical world and modernity…
Known to many scholars as the “Dark Ages,” the medieval period is often maligned as a cultural desert: barbarism, ignorance, suffering and violence. Its cultural achievements get less attention than the splendor of classical Greco-Roman civilization on one side, and the beginnings of modernity on the other.
The truth is that the Middle Ages were alive with their own vivid culture, history, and artistry — but modern perceptions are often blind to it.
Here are 3 facets of culture that showcase the captivating light of the so-called age of darkness…
1. An Enchanted Worldview
Have you ever wondered why so many fantasy novels are set against a backdrop of a medieval-inspired era?
The epic, enchanted world of fantasy is virtually inseparable from the Middle Ages. The time period was charged with a pervasive wonder.
Medieval Europe had what’s called an “enchanted worldview.” Essentially, it saw the natural world as intermingling with supernatural forces. Interacting with those forces became part of a larger story of the battle between good and evil. It imbued normal people’s everyday actions with a sense of meaning, adventure, and heroism.
These elements, all features of a medieval worldview, are inseparable from the fantasy genre. It’s no wonder the Middle Ages gave rise to works like Beowulf, The Song of Roland, and the Arthurian legends that still linger in our cultural consciousness today.
A world full of elves, prophecies, demons, wizards, dragons, castles, and knights might sound like a Tolkien fan’s dream come true, but of course there’s danger in romanticizing the Middle Ages. There’s no denying that life during these centuries was rugged and brutal.
But at the same time, Medieval life was more than a struggle for survival: it was a world charged with meaning and mystery. Framed by the Christian story, its worldview was saturated in the drama of good and evil, with every person understanding their life as a piece of this great narrative.
It’s no wonder epic stories like Tolkien’s find their expression in the worldview of the Middle Ages — and no wonder that, in our disenchanted world, readers find themselves drawn again and again to the light emanating from this so-called “dark” age.
2. Iconography
If you’ve encountered religious icons before, there’s a good chance your initial reaction was one of feeling underwhelmed — maybe even confused. Unlike later, more familiar art forms, iconography isn’t concerned with realistic details. To a modern, post-Renaissance viewer, that can be confusing.
Unlike the art of the Renaissance and later, iconography isn’t trying to show you an artist’s subjective vision. Instead, it’s showing you reality through the eyes of the faith — like “windows to Heaven.”
Icons typically depict a person or event from the Bible or the history of the Church. The visual language is complex:
“Flat” landscapes: no vanishing point or perspective, keeping the focus on the figures, not the background
Multiple parts of a story in the same frame (even if they happened sequentially) — to demonstrate they are part of the same spiritual event
Perfectly proportioned saints, regardless of their real appearance — to demonstrate that holy people are in harmony with themselves
It’s the very strangeness of the iconographic language that allows it to take on a sacred perspective. Its surreal depiction keeps it untethered to a particular time or place — so that its story remains accessible in all times and places.
Iconography was common to most religions of ancient times, but its Christian form gained ground when, in 330 AD, the Roman emperor Constantine moved the empire’s capital city from Rome to Byzantium.
He sought to shed the failing cultural and political milieu of the old capital and establish a “new Rome”, to integrate the power of the ancient empire with the glory of the new Christian religion.
This fusion of old and new is what made iconography so powerful. Christian iconography took cues from Greek and Roman art, while absorbing the symbolic riches of its Judaic roots. It used these ancient modes to depict new saints and doctrines, creating a system of communication that made the faith accessible to everyone, regardless of literacy.
Because iconography looks strange — perhaps even stuffy and stilted — to the modern eye, it’s easy to mistake it as a mere precursor to later forms of art. But it has its own discipline and power. Medieval people took seriously the idea that icons were windows to the divine, and filled their homes and churches with icons intended to let in the divine light.
But, their visual impact is hard to gauge when seeing them on a page or in a museum. If you want to come face-to-face with this light from the dark ages, it’s best to find them in their natural habitat: under candlelight in beautiful, centuries-old churches.
3. Gregorian Chant
Before the brilliance of Beethoven or the magic of Mozart, another kind of music spread across Europe. This music — as haunting as it is ancient — used no instruments and wasn’t performed in concert halls. Nonetheless, it quickly became the musical lifeblood of the Middle Ages.
Gregorian chant grew out of the Judaic practice of chanting Psalms. In monasteries, where monks were required to recite Psalms seven times a day, chant was necessary: it allowed them to standardize their liturgies so that they could sing together.
Still, the early centuries of the church saw a proliferating patchwork of singing styles: communities developed their own variations, and certain figures like St. Ambrose left behind their own personal influence.
It wasn’t until Pope St. Gregory ascended the papal throne that chant gained the recognizable form we know today. Under Gregory, Christian chant became relatively standardized in a form that still bears his name today.
Chant was such a cornerstone of medieval life that it (quite literally) shaped cathedrals — architects designed churches for auditory aesthetics, just as much as visual ones. The acoustics amplified singers’ voices so that a single chanter could be heard throughout the entire building. Some cathedrals were so exquisitely designed that seconds-long reverbs came from a single note.
Without Gregorian chant, the great classical music of later centuries wouldn’t exist. It pioneered musical notation (using four lines and large blocks to mark notes), and this method of sketching down and reading music would later develop into the modern 5-line staff that’s still used today.
But Gregorian chant is more than a precursor to classical music. It’s a stunning art form of its own. When you listen to it, you won’t hear the dramatic highs and lows of later classical music, and it doesn’t explore an individual artist’s vision or emotion.
Instead, it’s like the voice of the ancient past — solemn and remote, yet profoundly peaceful. You can feel the weight of millennia of history, and it still haunts us.
If you’re skeptical, try listening to a recording, or better, find an in-person performance. You’ll find that “dark age” art is truly illuminating — it shares the voice of the faith from centuries past, and the beauty that sustained generations through unimaginably precarious times.
Drama in the Darkness
Toward the end of the Medieval period, Renaissance art exploded onto the cultural landscape and drastically altered our attitudes and assumptions about what art is. That makes it relatively easy for a modern person to relate to the cultural output of the 15th, 16th, and subsequent centuries.
But peering further back in cultural history reveals a stranger and more challenging time. The creations of earlier centuries are less intuitive to us. But that doesn’t mean the Medieval era was the cultural nadir that the term “Dark Ages” implies.
The Medieval era engaged with a mythologically rich universe, not focusing on individual artists but on the adventure of living. Its art reflects the glory of that enchanted worldview…
Art of the Week
If there’s one work that speaks with the voice of the Middle Ages, it’s the Bayeux Tapestry.
It is an embroidered wall hanging that stretches 230 feet (about 14 car lengths) and is almost 2 feet tall. In a series of 58 scenes, similar to a cartoon strip or graphic novel, it depicts the drama leading up to Norman King William’s conquest of Anglo-Saxon Britain and his final victory at the Battle of Hastings in 1066.
This drama is central to British medieval history. In the 5th and 6th centuries, the Anglo-Saxons arrived in England from modern-day Scandinavia and Germany.
England grew strong under Anglo-Saxon rule and developed the cultural identity that gave birth to epics like Beowulf. But 500 years later, a new power overshadowed them: the Norman (hailing from modern-day France) king known to history as William the Conqueror.
William’s victory brought new cultural life to England. The French influence on British artistry gave rise to many of the courtly customs valued by the English aristocracy, and led to a great flourishing of poetry and prose. Still, British peasants chafed under the rule of a foreign power.
Likely commissioned by Bishop Odo of Bayeux to celebrate his half-brother William’s historic victory, the Bayeux Tapestry is nonetheless a touchstone of Anglo-Saxon memory.
The tapestry tells the political story of William’s conquest with incredible detail, featuring:
Halley’s comet
A coronation ceremony
An oath taken on sacred relics
A mortally ill King Edward of England
A detailed, graphic depiction of the Battle of Hastings
A mother begging enemy troops for mercy on her family
Historians celebrate the tapestry for its workmanship, including the exquisite detail of each scene and the harmony of its colors. But it’s the political commentary and insight into the turbulence of this world-altering event that makes the tapestry so special.
Created shortly after the Battle of Hastings in 1066, the Bayeux Tapestry is quickly coming up on 1,000 years old. Despite this, it remains vivid, insightful, and profoundly human.
It’s an eloquent voice from the Dark Ages, commenting on the universal experiences of war, failed diplomacy, humble people caught between clashing world powers, and ultimately, the destruction of a culture’s way of life.
I respectfully dissent from this narrative— popular in academic circles now—that the dark ages were not dark. I feel that view was born of the academic need to always say something different about the past, not any new evidence. Nobody, after all, is going to award you tenure for publishing an article that says, “on further examination…the Middle Ages were awful.” I also think there’s a bit of straw man arguing going on. “Dark” in these arguments is given a cartoonishly broad definition. To mean nothing of interest was created at all. And then any evidence of any artistic output, however mediocre, “disproves” it. E.g.:”voila! a colorful cartoon panel from the late Middle Ages!” In fact, the renaissance writers who first labeled the Middle Ages as “dark” were perfectly aware of all the “flat” religious iconography and “magical” thinking of that period. That was their point. Compared to Greece and Rome, and what they themselves were doing in art and architecture, the output of that 1000 years was poor. The images lacked perspective because people had forgotten how to do that, not because religious thinking required it. People engaged in more mystical thinking because scientific knowledge was lost after the collapse of Rome. Literacy plummeted too, to the point where hardly anyone outside a monastery could read or write. I’d call that a dark age. And anyone looking to relabel that period has to do more than dig up a painting or two. To lose the dark label you have to show the Middle Ages were equal to Greece, Rome, and the modern period. Good luck with that. Also: we are obviously taking only about Europe in that 1000 years here. That is all the Renaissance thinkers meant too when they created that label. This is an inherently euro-centric debate. So, it is not wrong to continue to use “dark age” about Western Europe at that time just because the Muslim world was flourishing. Which it was. I believe Europe’s biggest export at the time was slaves: mostly to North Africa. Because it was a dark age in Europe, but not in, say, Alexandria. So, yes, some interesting things were made during the Dark Ages in Europe, but not enough to make that label inaccurate.